Let's Fix Construction
  • Blog
  • Why & Who?
  • Workshops
    • Upcoming Workshops
    • A & E Coordination
    • CDT Education Program
    • Let's Fix Construction
    • Social Media & AEC
    • Specifier/Product Rep
    • Specs 101
    • Young Professionals
    • Past Workshops
  • Contributors
  • Submit
  • Accolades
  • Donate
  • Contact

Architects' Duty of Professional Service

3/26/2018

8 Comments

 
Picture
Contributed by Elias Saltz
There is some misunderstanding, both inside the profession and among the population at large, about what architecture is and what architects do.  The misunderstanding begins with popular cultural depictions of architects, both fictional and real, as iconoclastic visionaries who wave their hands around, making beautiful buildings appear - buildings that will be immortalized in the glossy pages of magazines and hardcover coffee table books.  This image of the architect is being reinforced by modern home improvement shows like "Fixer Upper" in which the designer and builder are the primary on-air personalities and it only takes one hour to buy, design and renovate an entire house.  It's also being reinforced, unfortunately, in architecture schools, where professors are teaching aspiring architects to think of their designs as grand conceptual gestures and to equate architecture with culinary arts and fashion design, but not to anticipate what working as an architect will really be like.

Architects are taught in school that what they want to design matters, and little is discussed about client expectations, except that in the case of design studios, the clients are the professors.  Architects learn to please other architects to ensure the best critique, grade and peer recognition.  That peer recognition extends into professional life, where architects look to have their work published in journals juried by other architects. 

This is obviously a wrong approach.  Architecture is a professional service.  Most architects come to understand this fact as they move up the ranks of practice.  When you look in the offices of real architecture firms today, you don't see Joanna Gaines or Howard Roark (perish the thought!) or Bobby Flay.  You see people who are working hard, using their knowledge and experience and skill to design projects on behalf of their clients.  But habits of hand-wavy thinking remain, embedded through the architect-as-chef idea, where big ideas matter and where a silver cover is whipped off a plate, revealing the delectable and beautiful creation hidden within (or, similarly, posterboards on wheels that depict the "before" condition are pulled apart to reveal the hour-of-TV creation), and that is why architects sometimes think that their beliefs matter more than those of their clients.
The Duty of Professional Service

As a professional providing a service, an architect's first duty is to his or her client, with a supplementary duty to the public for safety and welfare.  The client is the one paying for the architect's services, of course.  But architects are responsible for far more than their own services.  The construction cost of the facility will dwarf the architect's fees, and the long-term costs of operation, maintenance, and market-worthiness of the facility may again dwarf the construction cost.  The client is assuming massive risk based on the architect's work, risk that extends far beyond the architect's period of engagement.  The architect must help the client fully understand and manage that risk and all its long-term implications, including the risks that arise because the contract documents are inevitably imperfect. While seemingly daunting, there are a number of relatively straightforward things architects can do to ensure that they are providing proper professional service and meeting the duty they have to their clients.  

1. Leave your beliefs and preferences at the door.  The client shouldn't need to care how much an architect loves shiplap as an interior wall finish; perhaps he was hired because of the client's love of shiplap, in which case the client will ask for it.  In the context of a professional service, what the architect likes and wants doesn't matter.  Instead, listen to what the client wants, and provide a design that allows the facility to meet the client's needs and desires.

2. Know what you're talking about, and honor the limits of your knowledge.  Many architects think of themselves as generalists, knowing something about everything.  Generalists are useful, but there will be big knowledge gaps between what they know about a topic and what specialists know.  Where a specialist's input is required, architects will need to first realize that they need it, then obtain that input.  Additionally, they must make sure the client is aware when the architect has reached the limits of his or her knowledge and is either seeking or advising the client to seek outside help.  There's no shame in this, doctors do it all the time!

3. Obtain the client's informed consent.  The idea that a designer can send her clients away, renovate their entire house, and dramatically reveal it upon completion is patently absurd, even if it makes for good TV.  In real life, clients are intimately involved with the project continuously.  Architects must communicate with the clients about every decision that materially impact the clients' interests in the project, and owners must agree to those decisions.    Those interests are certainly financial, but may also involve the appearance or function of the facility, depending on what the client thinks is important.  As a follow-up to #2 above, consent without factual information doesn't count.  When the architect knows what he's talking about and is communicating accurately, the client can properly decide whether or not to accept the architect's advice. When the architect substitutes his or her opinions for facts, informed consent goes away.

4. Prioritize the writing of correct specifications. Specifications that are begun early on in the process and developed along with the drawings have the best chance of aligning all the documents to the project requirements.  They also allow the specifier the opportunity to use his or her more specialized knowledge to improve the overall quality of the technical aspects of the entire design.  A good specifier will care more about getting things right than about the overall appearance of the facility and can flag things that could be overly costly or create unnecessary long-term risk for the client.

Conclusion

It's impossible to overstate this, because architects like to profess that they value "healthy and livable communities" or that they "honor the broader goals of society."  Architecture is a professional service.  Like the practice of law or medicine, architects must be problem solving only on behalf of their clients, not society, providing their best skill and knowledge as educated, experienced professionals to meet their clients' needs and minimize their risks.
8 Comments
Frank Callis
3/27/2018 08:09:51 am

Good article. This definitely needed to be said.

Reply
Ian Hartsook link
3/27/2018 10:38:49 am

Great article. I'm new to the professional word, just finished my 5th year, and I agree with what you are saying. I had the thought many times while going through college that the setup seemed flawed. My degree was in Interior Design, but it was very closely related to and initially began the same way as the Architecture degree on our campus. I think it would be beneficial for the Architects, Engineers, and Interior designers to somehow have a project that they are all involved in. They have to work together in the real world so why not simulate this in school.

That thought is not really what you are talking about, but to reference your post I never really thought that it was realistic that every project we did we designed based off of our professors suggestions and with no budget. That never happens in the real world.

We all ultimately end up realizing this and change our ways (I assume) but it would be nice to have a taste of this in school.

Reply
Elias Saltz
3/27/2018 11:42:50 am

@Ian, It would benefit the profession if architectural education taught students how to work on projects in the same way they'd work in practice, including realistic client feedback and a requirement that they engage team members with different expertise.

I recall an instance in graduate school where we had a preliminary critique in which the students were asked to review one other. One student's drawing showed a massively extended cantilevered element with no thought to how it would be supported. I walked up to the drawing and asked how it was going to be supported. I recall drawing a collection of helium balloons over the cantilever, just to demonstrate how ridiculous it was. In response, the professor criticized me for asking such a mundane question. On the walls of a architecture school, gravity doesn't exist, I guess. Well, in real life, gravity is one of the first things we need to deal with. Reality matters.

Reply
Ian Hartsook
3/27/2018 11:51:16 am

@Elias
I agree. Not only for issues that you talk about, but also the fact that a part of our job is to handle/work with the clients emotions. Clients can get overwhelmed with the process and husband/wives don't always agree with one another. That is one aspect that I have been working on quite a bit. I was not really ready for that.

Reply
Framingham gc link
4/1/2018 02:50:14 pm

Architecture and Art schools can at times follow similar formulas. Which is that they don't teach real world application of their techniques and client handling in real world situations. These are all critical skills in the real world and can be the difference between being successful or not.

Reply
Thomas Jameson link
7/10/2019 11:58:35 am

It's good to know that a quality architect will leave their personal preference out of the design of a building for a client. My boss wants to build a new building for a top secret project that he's working on, and he doesn't want anyone's personal opinions interfering with his ideas. I'll pass this information along to him so that he knows what to look for in an architect.

Reply
Water Heater Replacement Kansas City link
1/3/2022 02:06:16 pm

Architects learn to please other architects to ensure the best critique, grade and peer recognition. Thank you for sharing your great post!

Reply
Hilda A. Ross link
7/23/2022 02:13:55 pm

I strongly believe the best results are obtained through personal learning.
Adults learning a second language can also benefit from a personal approach.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    About

    Let's Fix Construction is an avenue to offer creative solutions, separate myths from facts and erase misconceptions about the architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) industry.


    Check out Cherise's latest podcast
    Picture


    Get blog post notifications here

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    RSS Feed


    Archives

    March 2022
    May 2021
    May 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016

    Categories

    All
    Architecture
    Certification
    Collaboration
    Communication
    Concrete
    Construction
    Construction Administration
    Contract Documents
    CSI
    Education
    Estimators
    Fabrication
    Fix
    Manufacturing
    Misconception
    Myths & Facts
    Podcast
    Refresh
    Specifications
    Subcontractors
    Technology
    Training

    Tweets by FixConstruction
© COPYRIGHT 2021. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
  • Blog
  • Why & Who?
  • Workshops
    • Upcoming Workshops
    • A & E Coordination
    • CDT Education Program
    • Let's Fix Construction
    • Social Media & AEC
    • Specifier/Product Rep
    • Specs 101
    • Young Professionals
    • Past Workshops
  • Contributors
  • Submit
  • Accolades
  • Donate
  • Contact